Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
talk:proposals:new_map [2013/02/23 01:38]
smultanius
talk:proposals:new_map [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 Has te3 heard about the planned change? What's his opinion? If this is definitely going to happen, I think there should be a dedicated page explaining just what is going to happen, why it isn't as bad as you might think at first, and planned nations/​building projects for the new server. Then we can spam the server chat with it (though it seems mostly dead now that everyone knows about the plan for the new map), and make posts on KC and possibly /v/ or /tg/ recruiting people for the new map. The promise of new opportunity should let us make up for most of those we lose because of the change. Has te3 heard about the planned change? What's his opinion? If this is definitely going to happen, I think there should be a dedicated page explaining just what is going to happen, why it isn't as bad as you might think at first, and planned nations/​building projects for the new server. Then we can spam the server chat with it (though it seems mostly dead now that everyone knows about the plan for the new map), and make posts on KC and possibly /v/ or /tg/ recruiting people for the new map. The promise of new opportunity should let us make up for most of those we lose because of the change.
->Smultanius+-Smultanius
  
 +AlphaBernd said that he's going to change map only when there will be an update requesting this, but isn't fact that nether has to be reseted enough to do that? We will lose railways in nether with creation of new one and adding quartz to nether manually is really hard to do. Also, existing railways and other redstone stuff built will be obsolete. It'd be like switching map back to 1.7, new update brings too many changes. --- //Koinu//
 +
 +To Koinu: We had a discussion about resetting //only// the nether, a few weeks ago, that implied reasons as simple as new chunks with quartz and a railway with more ordnung. It is not enough of a reason to reset a whole map if you can limit the change to where it is really needed, no?  --- //​[[imosgud@gmail.com|Ranshiin Feeldragon]] 2013/02/23 11:20//
 +
 +I'm sure that while making new railways, many old places will be forgotten. Also about those places, maybe some players that stay all the time close to their settlements and the newest spawn don't feel it, but for a long time the only way to get to my settlement was going through Eien-Kyo and believe me, its abandoned walls aren't a nice sight. Seeing all this abandoned stuff is terrible. If you're not sure just go to the oldest spawn or take a rail to any abandoned settlement and see it yourself. Same goes for isolated places. I have the same feeling when i'm in Alisa, there'​re never any people around. It's like single player game. As it was said, we're losing the main point of playing a multiplayer game. --- //Koinu//
 +
 +As i previously said, and as i will repeat at nauseum, that's not a good justification to throw away this map.  --- //​[[imosgud@gmail.com|Ranshiin]] 2013/02/23 14:45//
  • talk/proposals/new_map.1361579901.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2020/11/08 04:01
  • (external edit)