This is an old revision of the document!

I don't think Enton is the worst mod ever and while doing some stuff right he unfortunately also goes off track sometimes. One thing I'd like to point out is his occasional mod abuse (yeah, this isnt some stupid trolling), like kicking me from #chat for talking about ingame matters with the poles regarding their language, or whenever he felt annoyed. Kicks from #chat shouldnt be done just because one does not like the opinion of another, valid reasons are spam, greatly unrelated matters, speaking in another language (like arab) for an extended period of time, but surely not different opinions. I feel that Enton is biased regarding the poles, he actively encouraged them speaking polish in the past, wouldnt even deal with it when various players complained, in the end the worst mod had to step in. Another thing are his bans, I feel that he bans people for too long of a time. This was shown in the case of kovio where he permabanned him without giving him a clear time when he would be able to play again, which felt more like toying with him than doing proper mod job. This is the result of a different style of playing, while I prefer more action and PVP Enton seems to see these activities as a disturbance to the server's peace. I don't want him demoded over different views though, its just that he overdoes it in some aspects. Until now I have not been sure whether a demodding was appropriate, since he did his job alright in some matters and most mods are controversial, but if the situation chris stated turns out to be true I don't think it's a matter that should be taken lightly. — areteee 03/07/13

He does enjoy toying with us because he can't stand how close we tiptoe to rulebreaking a lot of the time. The banning-kovio-for-a-month thing was absolutely ridiculous when you consider what he did (which was threaten to kill someone in game, by the way) but how he handled the situation of us asking for kovio to be unbanned was awful. #int, as I know it, is the how you're meant to complain about a ban. However, if any of us mentioned kovio in #int, we'd get kickbanned from the channel.
He's banned me from the wiki for making a vague page on my namespace called “the list” which was a parody because he didn't like the content. He would go on and on about how disrespectful it was for other mods to negate his decisions, but then he would remove people from the PVP list that other mods added, because I would refer to it, and we all know he doesn't like me. — k_chris 2013/03/08 00:00

The “requests” in #int evolved into spamming within days. Not saying that a “kickban” is the appropriate response, but to play the victims here is rather disingenuous. — Bragzor 2013-02-08 00:12 UTC+1

This was shown in the case of kovio where he permabanned him without giving him a clear time when he would be able to play again, which felt more like toying with him than doing proper mod job.

That's not how permabans work.
Also, if his two week ban wasn't lifted by someone else, it could have spared us some trouble. I know that it's very questionable to ban someone for something you didn't witness yourself, but I was pretty sure about that. Other mods just didn't seem to care, or they were even fighting on his side. How is that not biased? — Enton 2013/03/08 00:43
Enton you have a clear affiliation with Onionland, and I don't mind at all, but at least come to terms with it and stop saying you are a completely neutral party. Take sides is perfectly natural in any conflict situation whether it be in real life or online, but taking a side then repeating ad nauseum that you are “neutral” is despicable. While some bans are just, saying you are a neutral party when you are clearly not inflames the situation causing you more grief. Even if you were dragged into a political situation without you wanting it don't say you are something you are not, and try handle the situation tactfully. Right now your pigheadedness is just adding fuel to the fire. — green kitten 2013/03/08 02:35

know that it's very questionable to ban someone for something you didn't witness yourself, but I was pretty sure about that. Other mods just didn't seem to care, or they were even fighting on his side. How is that not biased? — Enton 2013/03/08 00:43

So you just believe everything you're told now? Not even I did that shit as a mod. You just banned him because someone told you he cheated and now to justify your ban you're assuming the mods that regulated the battle didn't care. Now, who told you that? The other Poles? Well of course, why would we questions the words of the heirs of the Catholic Empire of John Paul II? So to make it clear, you don't want other moderators to overrule you, you say you don't want to overrule other mods yet here you are disregarding a perfectly moderating battle thus overruling whoever took care of the issue first. I'm sorry but you're so much full of bullshit now. I can recognize when someone does what I used to do as a mod and now you're just looking for phony excuses to ban those who annoy you much like I looked for any excuse to ban kovio. — caBastard 2013/03/08 02:48