Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
talk:proposals:demod_enton [2013/03/08 03:39]
tetete
talk:proposals:demod_enton [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
Line 17: Line 17:
 \\ \\
 By the way, the only thing that unites the poles is that they joined at around the same time and speak the same language. There never was a DDoS, just a kid with a bot and a bunch of proxies, and that was solved by moving the server to another port for ten minutes (he didn't even come back afterwards, I was disappointed). The pole behind the lag machine was another one and I didn't even need to ban him, I just told him that he should stop using the lag machine because we don't roll like this here. He has caused no problems since that. And the packet loss/lag issues that the poles had for a while were unrelated network trouble. --- //​[[te3@irc.dev-urandom.eu|tetete]] 2013/03/08 03:32// By the way, the only thing that unites the poles is that they joined at around the same time and speak the same language. There never was a DDoS, just a kid with a bot and a bunch of proxies, and that was solved by moving the server to another port for ten minutes (he didn't even come back afterwards, I was disappointed). The pole behind the lag machine was another one and I didn't even need to ban him, I just told him that he should stop using the lag machine because we don't roll like this here. He has caused no problems since that. And the packet loss/lag issues that the poles had for a while were unrelated network trouble. --- //​[[te3@irc.dev-urandom.eu|tetete]] 2013/03/08 03:32//
 +\\
 +Who gives a shit. K_Chris is still unfairly unbanned and you're being to incompetent to do anything about it.  --- //​[[caBst@irc.dev-urandom.eu|caBastard]] 2013/03/08 04:24//
 +
 +The poles had broken the server rules and he had done nothing but support it and not ban the whole lot of them as he should have. He griebs people who resist his decisions that are clearly unfair toward them and against the server rules. And no rollbacking the damage does not fix the problem, that you did it our of butthurt towards my lawful attempt to remove the onion people who build near my settlement/​and within muh nation(while being helped and supported by you in this evil/​unlawful endeavor) with a clear purpose of trying to provoke me and trying to get me to admit their right to be there and give them some shitty enclave to spread their potato talk from. As everyone you either follow the rules bout war or you get a permission from me to build in New Finngolian clay. -[[people:​venomthrope|venomthrope]]-\\
 +\\
 +\\
 +>​Expecting this server to be moderated intelligently.
 +The staff is a fucking joke.   --- //​[[people:​vladimirr|vlad]] 2013/03/08 09:16//
 +
 +@V1ad: Including even you? 
 +caBastard: always watching, alway judging, never playing xD --- //​[[rosenbox@gmail.com|Rosenmann]] 2013/03/08 10:17//
 +\\ \\
 +@caBst: What else would you expect from someone you banned for very similar shit like three or four times before? Accusing me of being biased seems to turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy for some. Violating rules doesn'​t make you popular. \\
 +Also, I shortened the ban to six days because I banned him for two weeks before I left.  --- //Enton 2013/03/08 11:52// \\
 +
 +What I've read in here so far doesnt justify banning K_Chris on mere account of some "​witnesses"​. If there is no proof, there shouldnt be a fucking ban (when in doubt, for the accused). Either the poles provide screenshots or video evidence of Chris flying in battle or whatever the fuck you banned him for, or you don't ban if there is insufficient evidence. Since the battle was observed by a mod each time - and no mod would disregard the rules enough to not ban a cheater abusing in front of them in a battle - and you havent posted any proof yet, I kindly request K_Chris to be unbanned. The issue here isnt even if the poles are some sort of entity or shit, its the way Enton dealt with this situation, namely banning someone while trusting a party whose interest is contrary to K_Chris (and even if it wasnt, thats not enough). --- //areteee 2013/03/08 15:57//
 +\\
 +>What else would you expect from someone you banned for very similar shit like three or four times before?
 +It's not about what you should expect from them but what we expect the mods to do and that is giving a **fair** ban. Had K_Chris done something or not is not up to you to decide considering you didn't even presence the event. Is up to the mod present at the time to make that call.
 +>always watching, alway judging, never playing xD
 +Who would want to play in an admin-neglected server?
 + --- //​[[caBst@irc.dev-urandom.eu|caBastard]] 2013/03/08 18:57//
  • talk/proposals/demod_enton.1362710355.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2020/11/08 04:01
  • (external edit)