Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
talk:nations:wr-battx_treaties [2011/12/24 12:43] yugotexas |
talk:nations:wr-battx_treaties [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Good job creating a shitstorm on christmas eve, guys. -yugotexas | Good job creating a shitstorm on christmas eve, guys. -yugotexas | ||
+ | |||
+ | Not sure what is going on, but all inner party members do have equal status in Battkhortostan so you can't just appeal to me in order to get something passed, you must respect all of our members --- //[[people:sikandar|Sikandar]] 2011/12/24 15:13// | ||
+ | |||
+ | I made some joke. Can't even remember which one, it was not even Batt.x related. Mazznoff said the treaty is off. I said why? He answered because "it infringes my civil liberties", I asked why, no answer, I told him breaking a treaty is a bannable offence he faggot'd up and this shit. Even if all inner party members have equal status, I doubt Batt.x is mazznoff's personal army. If that's the case, then that's sad. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --- //[[caBst@irc.dev-urandom.eu|caBastard]] 2011/12/24 21:55// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **I told him breaking a treaty is a bannable offence** | ||
+ | |||
+ | And what clause did I violate? Breaking a treaty is a bannable offence, whereas **revoking it is not.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Never seen this rule anywhere, and it isn't written into the treaty that breaking it will result in punishment. This isn't Breshik, we aren't going to throw our members under the bus to keep you appeased. You can fuck off and we will bring up this moderator abuse with Alpha after Christmas. --- //[[people:sikandar|Sikandar]] 2011/12/24 23:27// |