Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
talk:decisions:constitution_and_criminal_law [2013/02/23 01:26]
v1adimirr Updated rules of engagement; possible limitations on a new map
talk:decisions:constitution_and_criminal_law [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
Line 261: Line 261:
  
 As the person who originally wrote the Rules of Engagement, I say with some embaressment that they were never intended to last this long.  They were originally only meant to be a temporary solution to an emergency problem. ​ For this reason, they are absolutely terrible. ​ They'​re far too complicated and specific and inflexible. ​ No math should be involved in this stuff. ​ I wrote some updated rules that I think will be just as binding but will also be much easier to understand. ​ In addition I posed a few more suggestions about possible rules on a new map.  [[talk:​people:​vladimirr|Click here to read :​-----DDDDD]] ​ --- //​[[people:​vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 01:23// As the person who originally wrote the Rules of Engagement, I say with some embaressment that they were never intended to last this long.  They were originally only meant to be a temporary solution to an emergency problem. ​ For this reason, they are absolutely terrible. ​ They'​re far too complicated and specific and inflexible. ​ No math should be involved in this stuff. ​ I wrote some updated rules that I think will be just as binding but will also be much easier to understand. ​ In addition I posed a few more suggestions about possible rules on a new map.  [[talk:​people:​vladimirr|Click here to read :​-----DDDDD]] ​ --- //​[[people:​vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 01:23//
 +
 +I also [[proposals:​propositions_on_nation_rules|posted something yesterday]],​ you can compare it to v1ad's version. His proposition is more specific on battle guidelines (and probably better) than mine, which is also covering other topics like nation privileges. ​ --- //Enton 2013/02/23 01:35//
 +
 +I was going to write some more about other topics, but what you've written is more or less what I was going to suggest. ​ I support all of it.  I think our positions on war are more or less the same with some minor differences. ​ I don't think, as you say, we should ban all war for war's sake if both sides agree to it.  However I like your part "​During a war, players of a nation can kill members of its enemy nation on its territory at any time." ​ I would add that to my own suggestion. ​ Everything else in there I support completely. ​ --- //​[[people:​vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 01:47//
 +
 +I drafted up a coherent [[talk:​people:​areteee|constitution and rules of engagement here]] that made minor edits to this constitution by including some of the above and some other suggestions people have provided. ​ I believe it to be both in the spirit of mazznoff'​s constitution while being perhaps more easily applicable to daily life on the server. ​ Please comment and include any concerns you have on it, as I would like to make this proposal to te3 ASAP.  Cheers. ​  --- //​[[people:​vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 22:24//
  • talk/decisions/constitution_and_criminal_law.1361579177.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2020/11/08 04:00
  • (external edit)