Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
decisions:venom_mod_abuse [2013/02/05 13:21] martyr Any questions? Playground -------> |
decisions:venom_mod_abuse [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP center round info 20%> | ||
| + | That's an mod abuse | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | t. [[people:vladimirr|Arbiter]] | ||
| + | </WRAP> | ||
| + | |||
| === Participants === | === Participants === | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 5: | Line 12: | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| === Events === | === Events === | ||
| - | On March 3rd 2013 areteee's, who is part of the [[http://dev-urandom.eu/doku.php/nations:hbe2#supporters|nazi-mongol-alliance]], may have remotely caused the death of PPA at spawn area. Without any request or formal complaint [[people:venomthrope|venomthrope]] decided to ban [[people:areteee|areteee]] saying that spawn area was neutral.\\ | + | On March 3rd 2013 areteee's, who is part of the [[http://dev-urandom.eu/doku.php/nations:hbe2#supporters|nazi-mongol-alliance]], killed PPA at spawn area. Without any request or formal complaint [[people:venomthrope|venomthrope]] decided to ban [[people:areteee|areteee]] saying that spawn area was neutral.\\ |
| \\ | \\ | ||
| However: \\ | However: \\ | ||
| 1) Venom did not see the "killing"\\ | 1) Venom did not see the "killing"\\ | ||
| - | 2) The logs state that PPA died of fire\\ | + | 2) The logs state that PPA died of fire - fire arrows are very powerful indeed\\ |
| - | 3) Even if areteee had killed PPA since they are at war it would have been legal\\ | + | 3) Even if areteee had killed PPA since they are at war it might have been legal if it had happened somewhere else\\ |
| - | 4) There is no positive rule stating that new spawn is a neutral area, venomthrope banned without a rule\\ | + | 4) There is no positive rule stating that new spawn is a neutral area, although this fact is actually unquestioned. Only formally, venomthrope might have banned without a rule\\ |
| - | 5) Even if there was such a rule, it would have had to specify what is defined as "spawn" and how large the neutral\\ "area" is, furthermore what "neutral" even means.\\ | + | 5) Even if there was such a rule, it would have had to specify what is defined as "spawn" and how large the neutral\\ "area" is, furthermore what "neutral", "area" or "defined" even means.\\ |
| - | Summarizing: spawns are neutral, but it doesn't mean you can't kill there anyone. | + | Summarizing: **spawns are neutral**, but it doesn't mean you can't kill there anyone. |
| - | 6) In the end venomthrope did not once justify the ban, nor did he reply to any complaints at all.\\ | + | 6) In the end venomthrope did not <del>once justify the ban, nor did he</del> reply to any complaints at all.\\ |
| 7) The ban was considered too short by many other players <wrap hi>[citation needed]</wrap>.\\ | 7) The ban was considered too short by many other players <wrap hi>[citation needed]</wrap>.\\ | ||